by Jordan Wilkerson
figures by Rebecca Senft
The blue, glimmering Pacific Ocean. On his 1997 trip from Hawaii back to the US mainland, Captain Charles Moore expected captivating views of its pristine waters. After all, he’d be sailing across one of the most remote regions of the ocean, one of Earth’s few oases untouched by industrialization. But the waters weren’t pristine. Instead, the captain and his crew were “confronted, as far as the eye could see,” with the sight of floating trash. The gargantuan whirlpool he sailed through is known as the North Pacific Ocean Gyre. He was the first to discover that the gyre was, and still is, trapping an immense amount of debris. That debris is almost entirely plastic.
The gyre, one of five in the world’s oceans (Figure 1), is now commonly termed the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. It’s a reasonable characterization considering that around 87,000 tons of plastic are currently floating in it. This plastic, though, is distributed over an area roughly the size of Texas, and much of it is in extremely tiny bits called microplastic. In that sense, the garbage patch is really more like a garbage soup. Though soupy, the unsightly collection of plastic can be a deadly trap for the marine creatures who encounter it.
The persistence of plastic
Why does plastic predominate in these remote ocean gyres? It’s certainly not the only thing we’re throwing out. Of the 260 million tons of solid waste that US consumers tossed in 2015, only 13% was plastic. In an unpleasant plot twist, the properties that make plastic so alluring are the same ones that make it the most persistent waste we produce.
Plastic is light, water resistant, insulating to heat & electricity, and remarkably durable. It’s also very cheap to make. The starting ingredient is raw organic material from petroleum, natural gas, or less typically dead plant matter – an ever more appealing option as the ire towards fossil fuels grows. This organic stuff is refined, purified, and ultimately converted into simple, carbon-based chemicals such as propylene or ethylene. These chemicals can be linked together to create the long carbon chains we call plastic.
When plastic first started being manufactured on a commercial scale in the 1950s, people viewed its alluring properties as revolutionary. They had a point. For example, when is the last time you saw a phone, computer, or any electrical wiring without an inexpensive, electrically resistant plastic casing? We have plastic to thank for the widespread availability of commercial electronics, including the one you’re likely using to read this right now.
However, the initial focus was on creation, with little thought of how difficult disposal might be. This difficulty is due to its durability. Plastic’s durable nature is remarkable because although it’s made from organic matter, living things cannot digest it and break it down – a stark contrast to food and paper waste. Plastic’s intractably long chains of carbon make it impossible for even bacteria to break down, the process by which most waste degrades in our landfills. Consequently, plastic can stay around for hundreds of years (unless we recycle or incinerate it, neither of which we do much of). Over a third of plastic is made for single use, most of it being discarded within a year of manufacture. Where does this discarded plastic go? All over the place, being found in natural habitats from the poles to the equator. In particular, around 8 million tons of it enter the oceans each year.
Plastic’s low density allows it to float on water and be swept away by winds and waves across the seas. While most of the plastic lost to the ocean eventually returns to us by littering our shores (Figure 2), much of it is carried all over the oceans where it accumulates in massive gyres. Plastic’s durability does have a limit. The sun’s ultraviolet light and harsh ocean waves can break down the carbon chains somewhat effectively. This doesn’t improve the situation, though; the plastic merely fragments into smaller bits, often less than a few millimeters in diameter.
Sea turtles and other lovable marine creatures get tangled up in netlike plastic debris, but the microplastics can present serious issues, too. For instance, what would eat a tiny piece of plastic about the size of plankton? Anything that eats plankton. This includes animals of all sizes, from whales to scallops. The plastic fragments get small enough that even plankton can manage to have a taste. The microplastics get trapped in the gills and digestive tracts of hundreds of animal species and can cause all sorts of serious impairments, many of which may lead to death.
There’s an additional concern that hits closer to home. Scientists examined fish and shellfish from various markets in California and Makassar, Indonesia. Most of them had plastic or textile fibers in their bodies. Another research team looked to see if microplastics were hidden within one of society’s most widely used ingredients: commercial salt (which is often produced by evaporating sea water). They were. This means we’re likely consuming some of these microplastics, too. It’s unclear whether this would cause any serious issues. Still, the fact that we may be eating some of the floating ocean plastic pulls it away from being a strictly environmental issue to one potentially of public health.
Cleaning up the garbage soup
Ecosystem damage and public health concerns serve as hearty motivation for The Ocean Cleanup Project, a project funded to undertake the largest ocean clean up in history. Their method of cleaning up the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is to deploy 2000-foot-long floating rods that will corral floating plastic so it can be periodically collected by ships. They will miss the microplastic, but that’s not their goal. They aim to round up larger pieces of plastic before sunlight and waves break them into thousands of microplastic bits.
This is the most ambitious ocean clean up ever undertaken. But will it work? The project asserts that an entire fleet entailing around 60 of these devices is necessary to clean up half of the Garbage Patch in 5 years. As of now, they have deployed one. Separately, scientists have expressed concern about how the project might affect marine life such as plankton who could get swept up along with the floating debris. However, the impact on plankton, along with many of the other sea creatures, “should remain local and negligible in comparison to vastness of the North Pacific Ocean” according to Erika Träskvik, an Ocean Cleanup representative who cited the project’s recently released environmental impact assessment as evidence.
The most common response to the project, however, highlights the central issue with plastic pollution in general: Ocean Cleanup’s fleet is nowhere near sufficient considering how much plastic we’re producing—and discarding—every year. Ideally, we’d take action to keep plastic waste from getting into the ocean in the first place. Both governments and businesses seem to agree. This summer, Starbucks and McDonald’s both announced plans to phase out single-use plastic straws, but this is a tepid example. The European Union has plans to ban all single-use plastics by 2021, and 250 major brands such as Nestle and Coca-Cola announced they’ll do the same by 2025. Even in the Massachusetts city of Somerville where I live, I stopped being offered plastic bags at my local convenience stores because of a plastic bag ordinance issued by the city.
Plastic, our bane and boon
People around the world are gathering their torches and pitchforks to protest single-use plastic. Considering the condition of our oceans alone, this feels justified. But let’s not forget that plastic can be used to the environment’s benefit, too. Cars and planes partly made of plastic are much lighter, significantly reducing the amount of fossil fuels required to run them. Many solar panels have protective plastic layers, and wind turbines’ blades are often made of lightweight, reinforced plastic. We don’t need to limit ourselves to environmental benefits either. Plastic has revolutionized almost every aspect of society.
Still, as I type these words in a coffee shop, a single-use plastic bottle is sitting to the right of my computer. And perhaps, you’re drinking from a plastic cup now. Will the plastic in our hands eventually haunt our oceans? What will we do to prevent that?
Jordan Wilkerson is a graduate student in the Department of Chemistry & Chemical Biology at Harvard University.
Rebecca Senft is a fourth-year Program in Neuroscience Ph.D. student at Harvard University who studies the circuitry and function of serotonin neurons in the mouse.
For More Information:
- Brief Explanation of How Plastics are Made by PlasticsEurope, Association of Plastics Manufacturers
- Guide to Recycling Basics by US Environmental Protection Agency
- More Information on Marine Debris by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Cover image credit: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Ben Mierement)
9 thoughts on “The Plastic in our Oceans”
If you’re in the US, the plastic you’re using is not destined for the ocean. The problem is that countries like China, Indonesia, Vietnam, et al do not have adaquate waste management infrastructure — several studies have shown that almost all of the plastic in the ocean originates from those countries.
I would like to point out something. Much of the plastic from the US is shipped back to Asia. That is the only reason that those countries contribute to the problem. WE in industrialized nations (and our massive consumption practices) ARE the problem.
You are correct and incorrect – 2nd and 3rd world countries are the major culprit to Ocean pollution; however, the amount of plastic litter in Virginia and North Carolina and California is astonishing…all of it found on river beaches, ocean beaches, and inland – parking lots, rain sewer gutters and making their way through wide rain sewer grates uncaptured down to rivers out to the Bays and Oceans in short order! And, the problem is worsening by the day!!!
The companies producing plastics make significant profits per annum, have done so for greater than 60 years, and yet are not being required to be responsible for the products they produce. If you produce a pollutant you should have to pay the cost of it’s remediation. These companies have had a free ride for far too long.
They should be the subject of international environmental taxation to force them to be participants in the cleanup of the ugly mess they have created. Safe havens for production without consequence must be eliminated. We make miners pay for environmental costs, big tobacco pays and should be paying even more, every plastics producer from the very small to the very large needs to be forced to pay an increasing amount of their profits to make it financially painful for them to produce plastics that are not biodegradable. Forcing plastic manufacturers to pay the costs of remediation before plastic garbage turns the ocean gyres into plastics created dead zones must find support and the political will to force the poluters to pay must be demonstrated very soon.
Although keeping the plastics out of the oceans and landfills is the optimal solution, collecting the plastic is the first priority and each country needs to address this.
PLASTICS IN OUR OCEANS
The United Nations should be the driving force to address the worlds problem of plastics in our oceans. The enlistment and dispatch of several large specially designed ships outfitted with natural gas fired incineration units would ether incinerate or turn the plastics into reclaimable material for re-manufacturing of usable products. The enlistment of fishing and other small boats would gather and deliver the plastics to the ships. The funding for this would be from, taxes, donations from people, countries and later the added sale of the reclaimed product.
This is a problem every one needs to address. Corporations, Countries and individuals. We all need to do our part to help our oceans. Our oceans are valuable to our existence. With the sad times we’re in right now with covid-19. We have seen the changes in pollution, and the improvement with our air. If we all work together we can clean our oceans and our land and heal our earth. God Bless everyone!!
I’m guessing some roundabout logic like “we recycle the plastic waste in places that dump it in their rivers, so we’ll ban plastic products because we don’t want plastic waste dumped in rivers”. I guess injection molding companies still helpful, even if it reduces worldwide pollution by 0.1%, which makes it hard to criticize, but clearly the money and effort involved in cleaning up already (comparatively) clean countries is well up there in diminishing returns zone. I’m honestly curious BTW, I feel like there’s a large disconnect between what’s being done (in places that actually do anything about the problem) and the actual sources of the plastic pollution.
I am come here first time, I locate the ideal article. A debt of gratitude is in order for sharing fascinating and enlightening post.
we should develop some kind of substance that can dissolve the plastic while cleaning the water