A Chinese researcher, He Jiankui, shocked the world two weeks ago when he revealed that the world’s first genetically edited babies had been born. Jiankui claimed to have edited embryos before implanting them into the mother as part of an otherwise routine in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedure. Since his bold announcement via YouTube, the scientific community at-large – both in the United States and in China – has strongly denounced this work as deeply unethical and dangerous.

CRISPR, a relatively quick and easy gene-editing technology, is utilized in several ongoing research efforts and clinical trials to prevent or cure diseases. However, the experiment that Jiankui did is fundamentally different from any ongoing gene-editing trials. He used CRISPR to edit germline cells (which include eggs, sperm, and embryos) as opposed to somatic cells (which include other cell types in the body, such as heart, liver, or kidney cells). While genetic changes to most somatic cells remain confined to that individual, changes to germline cells have the potential to be inherited by generations to come.

Many researchers agree that CRISPR technology is too immature to even consider the ethical permissibility of making permanent inherited changes to human genomes.

Jiankui used CRISPR to disrupt the gene for CCR5, a protein on the outer surface of cells that HIV uses to enter. He claimed that disruption of CCR5 would ensure that these babies would be protected from contracting HIV infection. However, HIV can enter cells in other ways that don’t use CCR5, and there are other, safer ways of preventing and controlling HIV infection, calling into question the entire ethical premise of the research.

Jiankui’s work has reignited a much-needed dialogue about the ethics of human germline genetic editing, and it has brought to light concerns about potential unintended consequences. Scientists cannot always be certain of the effect that a genetic change might have. For example, while disrupting the CCR5 receptor might decrease the risk of HIV infection, a significant body of work suggests that this might also increase the risk of contracting other infections such as the West Nile virus. And with current gene-editing technology, there is no way to rapidly reverse genetic changes if they do not have the desired effect – or if there are other unpredictable effects, such as unintended editing at off-target sites in the genome. The general consensus in the scientific community is that CRISPR-mediated gene editing is not ready to edit the human germline. But will scientists like Jiankui continue to push forward anyway?

Managing Correspondent: Radhika Agarwal

Popular news article: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07545-0

Image Credit: Dovidena, CC 4.0

20 thoughts on “China’s Genetically Edited babies: What really happened?

  1. A designer baby is a baby whose genetic makeup has been selected or altered, often to include a particular gene or to remove genes associated with a disease. but it can also harmfully reduce human diversity and increase social inequality by editing out the kinds of people that medical science, and the society it has shaped, categorize as diseased or genetically. that’s that Chinese scientist got jail who do this thing.

    The long-term effects remain to be seen – but, Prof Lovell-Badge added, the main concern is “whether the three babies born are going to be healthy and looked after well”. your content and factors in this article are true. Thank you for your genuine content.

  2. Great! I should certainly pronounce, impressed with your website. I had no trouble navigating through all tabs as well as related info ended up being truly simple to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it in the least. Reasonably unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or anything, web site theme . a tones way for your customer to communicate. Nice article.

  3. Advancement demands new creation. Although,I too agree that Genetic Edited babies can germinate a huge threat to the new generation but if used properly and in controlled methods then it can be a boon for parents who can’t give birth or those who have a family medical conditions like HIV and Diabetes.

  4. Today, such experiments are very inspiring to learn more about genetically edited babies. When we read this kind of information, it seems that we are increasing our knowledge more.

  5. Today, such experiments are very inspiring to learn more about genetically edited babies. When we read this kind of information, it seems that we are increasing our knowledge more.

  6. We have been waiting a long time for a new blog. Your web writing skills and experience drive my mind crazy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *